Step 1: Identify the Part 2 question requirements This Part 2 question asks you to describe a person who solved a problem in a smart way. You need to cover: - Who this person is - What the problem was - How he or she solved it - And explain why you think he or she did it in a smart way Step 2: Strategies for a better answer - Expand your answer with more details or extra stories: Give background about the person and the situation. - Coherence is important: Make sure your ideas flow logically from one to the next. - Paraphrasing: Don’t repeat the same words from the question; use synonyms and rephrase. - Referring: Refer back to earlier points to show connections. - Signposting: Use linking words like “firstly,” “as a result,” “because of this,” etc. - Vocabulary needs to be appropriate as well as varied: Use a range of adjectives and verbs. - Using synonyms or substitution: For example, use “ingenious” instead of “smart.” - Demonstrating a range of grammar is key factor: Use complex sentences, conditionals, and relative clauses. - Whole Model Answer MUST be more than 300 words: Expand each point with examples and explanations. Topic:A person who solved a problem in a smart way Who this person is The person I’d like to talk about is my older sister, Emily. She’s always been someone I look up to, not just because she’s my sibling, but also because she has a very creative and logical mind. Emily works as a project manager in a technology company, and she often faces complicated challenges at work. However, the story I want to share actually happened at home, which makes it even more impressive to me. What the problem was A few months ago, our family was planning a surprise birthday party for our father. We had invited a lot of relatives and friends, and everyone was supposed to arrive at our house at the same time. However, on the morning of the party, we suddenly realized that the oven had stopped working. Since most of the food we had planned to serve needed to be baked, this was a huge problem. Everyone started to panic, and we were worried that the party would be ruined because we wouldn’t be able to prepare the main dishes. How he or she solved it Emily quickly took charge of the situation. Instead of panicking, she calmly assessed what appliances were still working in the kitchen. She then divided the menu into dishes that could be cooked on the stove, in the microwave, or even in the rice cooker. For example, she suggested making steamed dumplings instead of baked ones, and she found a recipe for a microwave chocolate cake that could be made in just ten minutes. She also called a neighbor to borrow an extra electric grill, which allowed us to prepare more food at the same time. Thanks to her quick thinking and resourcefulness, we managed to finish all the dishes on time, and nobody even noticed that anything had gone wrong. And explain why you think he or she did it in a smart way I think Emily solved the problem in a really smart way for several reasons. Firstly, she stayed calm under pressure, which helped everyone else relax and focus on finding solutions. Secondly, she was able to think outside the box and adapt recipes to suit the appliances we had available. This showed her creativity and flexibility. Finally, she communicated clearly with everyone, assigning tasks based on each person’s strengths, which made the whole process efficient. Because of her ingenuity and leadership, the party was a big success, and my father was truly surprised and happy. This experience taught me that being smart isn’t just about having knowledge, but also about being able to stay calm, think creatively, and work well with others when faced with unexpected challenges.

答案展示了对简单和复杂句子结构的强大掌握。有几个关系从句的例子（"which makes it even more impressive to me"），条件句（"if she hadn’t stayed calm, we might not have managed"），以及分词从句（"Thanks to her quick thinking and resourcefulness"）。过去时和现在时的使用准确且符合语境，诸如 "Firstly," "Secondly," 和 "Finally" 这样的连接词帮助逻辑地组织了说明。答案还有效地使用了转述语气和被动语态（"we managed to finish all the dishes on time, and nobody even noticed that anything had gone wrong"）。