7 分范例
问题: Should scientists explain the research process to the public?
思路 1
Yes
是的
考官答案
Yes, scientists should explain their research process to the public. It helps people understand science better and builds trust in scientific findings. When people know how science works, they can make better decisions. Plus, it makes science more open and accountable. It might even inspire young people to become scientists. Also, explaining research can help clear up any myths or wrong ideas people might have.
是的,科学家应该向公众解释他们的研究过程。这有助于人们更好地理解科学,并建立对科学发现的信任。当人们了解科学的运作方式时,他们能够做出更好的决策。此外,这使科学更加公开和负责任。它甚至可能激发年轻人成为科学家的兴趣。同样,解释研究过程可以帮助澄清人们可能存在的误解或错误观念。
思路 2
No
考官答案
I don't think it's always necessary for scientists to explain their research to the public. The complexity of scientific research can lead to misunderstandings if not communicated properly. There's also the risk of oversimplifying the information, which might not accurately represent the research. Not everyone is interested or has the time to understand these explanations. Plus, scientists might not have the skills to communicate effectively, leading to misinterpretation of their findings.
我不认为科学家总是有必要向公众解释他们的研究。科学研究的复杂性如果传达不当,可能会导致误解。还有将信息过于简化的风险,这可能不能准确反映研究内容。并非所有人都有兴趣或时间去理解这些解释。此外,科学家可能缺乏有效沟通的技能,导致他们的发现被误解。
思路 3
It Depends
视情况而定
考官答案
It depends on the research topic and its impact on society. Some research might be too technical for the general public to understand. However, for controversial or high-impact studies, it's important to explain the research process. Public interest and demand can guide how much explanation is needed. It's about finding a balance between being transparent and maintaining the integrity of the scientific work.
这取决于研究主题及其对社会的影响。有些研究可能对公众来说过于技术化,难以理解。然而,对于有争议或影响重大的研究,解释研究过程是很重要的。公众的兴趣和需求可以指导需要多少解释。这是在透明公开与保持科学工作的完整性之间找到平衡。