7 分范例
问题: Is it necessary to provide free public transportation?
思路 1
Yes
是的
考官答案
Yes, I think free public transportation is a good idea. It can help reduce traffic and pollution because more people would use it instead of driving. It also makes transportation accessible for everyone, no matter how much money they have. This is especially helpful for students and people with low incomes, as it helps them save money. Plus, it encourages sustainable living by reducing our carbon footprint.
是的,我认为免费公共交通是个好主意。它可以帮助减少交通密度和污染,因为更多的人会选择使用公共交通而不是开车。它也使得交通对每个人都变得可达,无论他们有多少钱。这对学生和低收入人群特别有帮助,因为这可以帮助他们省钱。此外,它通过减少我们的碳足迹来鼓励可持续生活。
思路 2
No
考官答案
No, I don't think free public transportation is necessary. It would be very expensive for the government to maintain, and this could lead to higher taxes. Also, if it's free, people might not appreciate it and could misuse it, leading to overcrowding and a drop in service quality. The money could be better spent on other important services like healthcare or education.
不,我认为免费公共交通并不是必要的。这对政府来说会非常昂贵,可能导致更高的税收。此外,既然是免费的,人们可能不会珍惜,可能会滥用,导致拥挤和服务质量下降。这笔钱可以更好地用于其他重要服务,如医疗或教育。
思路 3
It Depends
这取决于
考官答案
It depends on the situation. In big cities with lots of people, free public transportation could be very helpful. But in rural areas where not many people use it, it might not be necessary. It's important to test it first with pilot programs to see if it works well. Also, a mix of free and paid services could be considered, like offering subsidies for certain groups. We should look at the long-term benefits for the economy and environment before deciding.
这要看情况。在人口众多的大城市,免费公共交通可能非常有帮助。但在使用人数不多的农村地区,这可能不是必要的。重要的是先通过试点项目进行测试,以了解其效果。此外,还可以考虑混合免费和收费服务,比如为某些群体提供补贴。我们在做决定之前应该考虑经济和环境的长期利益。