Part 1
考官
Did you like going to parks as a child?
考生
Yes absolutely. I love going to parks as a child because I can meet and make a lot of friends in my similar age so and also I got people to accompany with me to play together. So especially when especially I do not have any brothers and sisters so the park becomes where I do social.
考官
Do you still like going to parks now?
考生
Yes, but in a different purpose. I'm going to the parks now. It's like somehow a mental relief for me because parks has so many plans and green flowers etcetera. So this gives me a feeling of pleasance and kind of get rid of the hustling lifestyle and Hong Kong.
考官
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
考生
Yes, definitely. I know many parks in Hong Kong are really stunning and many umm different fields and so you can. So usually these parts are filled in coastal areas so you can see Hong Kong sea fields and different perspectives.
考官
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
考生
I would like to go to the Country Park or national parks in other countries. I know in Canada and US there are a lot of national parks which I can feel different landscapes and these are not the that Hong Kong do not have any these sort of parks located.
Did you like going to parks as a child?
分数: 62.0建议: Be more concise and correct grammar: start with a clear topic sentence, then give one or two specific supporting details using linking words. Avoid repetition and incorrect tense. Also correct collocations (e.g., “of a similar age”, “siblings”, “socialise”).
示例: Yes, I loved going to parks as a child. They were a great place to meet other children of a similar age, and I often played games with friends there. Because I didn’t have any siblings, parks became my main place to socialise.
Do you still like going to parks now?
分数: 60.0建议: Improve grammar and vocabulary, give one clear reason with specific details and use linking words (e.g., “because” or “so”). Correct noun/verb forms and use precise vocabulary (e.g., “mental relief,” “green plants,” “relaxing”). Keep to 2–4 sentences.
示例: Yes, but for a different reason now. I visit parks to relax because the green plants and quiet paths give me mental relief. As a result, I can escape the hectic pace of life in Hong Kong for a while.
Would you like to see more parks in your city?
分数: 58.0建议: Be specific and avoid vague phrases. Start with a clear opinion, then give one or two concrete reasons with linking words (e.g., “because”, “for example”). Fix vocabulary (e.g., “coastal areas”, “seaside views”, “varied landscapes”) and remove fillers like “umm”.
示例: Yes, definitely. I would like more parks because they provide green space and seaside views in coastal areas. For example, parks near the harbour offer pleasant walks and different perspectives of the city.
Are there any parks you want to go to in the future?
分数: 56.0建议: Make the answer grammatically correct and specific: name places, explain why, and use linking words. Avoid repetition and unclear phrases. Use correct country names and collocations (e.g., “national parks in Canada and the US”, “diverse landscapes”).
示例: Yes, I would love to visit national parks in countries like Canada and the United States because they have vast, diverse landscapes. For instance, I want to see the mountains and forests in Banff National Park to experience scenery that Hong Kong lacks.
× Yes absolutely. I love going to parks as a child because I can meet and make a lot of friends in my similar age so and also I got people to accompany with me to play together.
✓ Yes, absolutely. I loved going to parks as a child because I could meet and make a lot of friends of a similar age, and I also had people to accompany me to play together.
The student mixes present tense (I love, I can) with reference to childhood. Use past tense to describe past habits: 'loved', 'could', 'had'. 'Similar age' should be 'of a similar age'. 'Accompany with me' is incorrect; use 'accompany me'. Suggestion: Use past tense consistently when talking about past experiences and correct prepositional phrases.
× So especially when especially I do not have any brothers and sisters so the park becomes where I do social.
✓ Since I did not have any brothers or sisters, the park became a place where I could be social.
Redundant 'especially when especially' and awkward structure 'the park becomes where I do social'. Use 'Since' or 'Because' to introduce reason, past tense 'did not', 'became', and phrase 'be social' or 'socialize'. Suggestion: Remove redundancy and use natural verb 'socialize' or 'be social'.
× Yes, but in a different purpose. I'm going to the parks now.
✓ Yes, but for a different purpose. I go to parks now.
'In a different purpose' is incorrect preposition; use 'for a different purpose'. 'I'm going to the parks now' suggests a future or present continuous habitual incorrectly. Use present simple 'I go to parks now' for habitual action. Suggestion: Use 'for' with 'purpose' and present simple for habits.
× It's like somehow a mental relief for me because parks has so many plans and green flowers etcetera.
✓ It's a kind of mental relief for me because parks have many plants and green foliage, etc.
'It's like somehow' is informal; 'a kind of' is clearer. 'Parks has' is subject-verb disagreement — plural 'parks' takes 'have'. 'Plans' likely intended 'plants'. 'Green flowers' is odd; 'green foliage' or 'trees and flowers' is better. Suggestion: Use correct verb agreement and correct word 'plants' and clearer nouns.
× So this gives me a feeling of pleasance and kind of get rid of the hustling lifestyle and Hong Kong.
✓ So this gives me a feeling of pleasure and helps me get away from the hectic lifestyle in Hong Kong.
'Pleasance' is incorrect word; use 'pleasure'. 'Kind of get rid of' is informal and ungrammatical; use 'helps me get away from'. Word order and preposition: 'in Hong Kong'. Suggestion: Use accurate nouns and clear verbs for effects ('helps me get away from').
× Yes, definitely. I know many parks in Hong Kong are really stunning and many umm different fields and so you can.
✓ Yes, definitely. I know many parks in Hong Kong are really stunning and have different areas or fields you can explore.
The sentence is fragmented and uses 'many umm different fields and so you can' which is incomplete. Replace with 'have different areas or fields you can explore'. Suggestion: Complete the clause and choose appropriate nouns ('areas', 'grounds') and verbs ('explore').
× So usually these parts are filled in coastal areas so you can see Hong Kong sea fields and different perspectives.
✓ Usually these parks are located in coastal areas, so you can see the Hong Kong seascape and different viewpoints.
'Filled in coastal areas' is incorrect; use 'located in coastal areas'. 'Sea fields' is not natural — 'seascape' or 'sea views'. 'Different perspectives' -> 'different viewpoints' or 'vistas'. Suggestion: Use 'located' for placement and correct collocations like 'seascape' and 'viewpoints'.
× I would like to go to the Country Park or national parks in other countries.
✓ I would like to go to country parks or national parks in other countries.
'The Country Park' sounds like a specific park; use plural or generic 'country parks' unless referring to a named park. Modal 'would like to' is correct. Capitalization: 'country park' not necessarily capitalized. Suggestion: Use plural for general preference and correct capitalization.
× I know in Canada and US there are a lot of national parks which I can feel different landscapes and these are not the that Hong Kong do not have any these sort of parks located.
✓ I know in Canada and the US there are a lot of national parks where I can experience different landscapes, which Hong Kong does not have.
The original is ungrammatical and redundant: 'which I can feel different landscapes' should be 'where I can experience different landscapes'. Remove extra words 'these are not the that' and fix subject-verb agreement 'Hong Kong does not have'. Add 'the' before 'US'. Suggestion: Use relative clauses correctly ('where' for places) and correct subject-verb agreement; simplify the sentence to avoid redundancy.