Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Make the response more natural and concise, start with a clear topic sentence, correct tense and pronoun usage, and add one specific supporting detail. Use linking words to connect ideas and keep it to no more than 3–4 sentences.

Ví dụ: No, I didn't. I grew up in a very crowded neighborhood with no nearby park, so there wasn't a safe place to ride. For that reason my parents decided not to buy a bike.

Gợi ý: Begin with a direct opinion, use clearer reasoning and examples, correct awkward phrasing, and use linking words (e.g., 'however', 'because') to make the answer coherent. Keep it within 3–4 sentences and include a specific example or statistic if possible.

Ví dụ: Yes, to some extent. Many people use bikes to commute short distances in cities because they are cheap and convenient; however, they are less popular for long journeys since riding for a long time can be tiring. For example, in my city cyclists usually use bikes for trips under 5 km.

× No I didn't because where I lived as a child was very crowded area so we can't go out for biking like for long hours and there was no park near it so didn't have a bike while growing up.

✓ No, I didn't, because where I lived as a child was a very crowded area, so we couldn't go out biking for long periods, and there was no park nearby, so I didn't have a bike while growing up.

This sentence has multiple sentence structure and tense consistency issues. Problems include missing articles ('a very crowded area'), incorrect tense/modal usage ('we can't' should be past 'we couldn't' to match 'lived' and 'didn't'), awkward phrasing ('go out for biking like for long hours' is informal and ungrammatical), and a missing subject in the second clause ('so didn't have a bike' needs subject 'I'). Suggestion: break into clearer clauses, keep past tense consistent, add necessary articles and subjects, and use natural collocations such as 'go out biking for long periods' and 'park nearby'.

× To some extent yes they are popular, like many people use them to commute for their work daily.

✓ To some extent, yes, they are popular; many people use them to commute to work every day.

The original sentence is understandable but has punctuation and preposition problems. 'For their work daily' is awkward; the natural collocation is 'commute to work' and 'every day' instead of 'daily' in this context. Also add commas for clarity. Suggestion: use 'commute to work every day' and proper punctuation.

× But other than that I don't think they are very popular as it takes people to travel a lot with them and they are very exhausting.

✓ But other than that, I don't think they are very popular because travelling long distances on them is tiring.

This sentence misuses 'takes people to travel a lot with them' and 'they are very exhausting'. 'Tiring' describes how people feel; 'exhausting' describes something that causes exhaustion but is less natural here. 'It takes people to travel a lot with them' is ungrammatical; use 'travelling long distances on them' or 'using them for long trips'. Suggestion: rephrase to 'travelling long distances on them is tiring' or 'using them for long trips is exhausting' and add comma after 'But other than that'.