Bike— Part 1 Relatório

Sugestão: Be careful with verb tense and give one or two specific details. Start with a clear topic sentence in past tense, then add brief supporting details using linking words. Avoid overly short or vague replies.

Exemplo: Yes, I did. I had a bright red BMX that I loved because it was sturdy and easy to ride. For example, I used it to ride to the park every weekend, and I learned to do simple stunts on it.

Sugestão: Give a clear opinion and support it with specific reasons and linking words. Use accurate grammar and natural phrases; avoid literal translations. Keep answers to a maximum of about three sentences and include one or two concrete examples or comparisons.

Exemplo: Not really — bikes are less popular in Hong Kong because the city is crowded and many people prefer public transport. For instance, narrow streets and busy traffic make cycling difficult, so most residents choose the MTR or buses instead.

× Yes, of course, I have a very cool bike.

✓ Yes, of course, I had a very cool bike.

The examiner asked about ownership in the past (when you were a child), so the student should use past tense. Using 'have' is present tense; change to 'had' to match the time frame. Suggestion: Use past tense verbs when describing past situations (e.g., 'I had', 'I used to have').

× I'm afraid not because I live in Hong Kong.

✓ I'm afraid not because I live in Hong Kong.

This sentence is grammatically correct in tense and form. It states a present reason for a general idea. No correction is needed. Suggestion: None.

× The Hong Kong with less power for bike.

✓ Hong Kong has less support for bicycles.

The original sentence is ungrammatical and unclear. It lacks a proper subject-verb structure and uses incorrect noun phrases ('the Hong Kong', 'less power for bike'). Corrected version uses subject 'Hong Kong', proper verb 'has', and clearer noun phrase 'less support for bicycles'. Suggestion: Use a clear subject and verb (e.g., 'Hong Kong has') and choose appropriate nouns ('support' or 'infrastructure' for policies/resources) and plural nouns for general statements ('bicycles').

× The Hong Kong with less power for bike.

✓ Hong Kong has less investment in cycling infrastructure.

Besides sentence structure issues, the phrase 'power for bike' is an incorrect prepositional/nominal choice. Using 'investment in' correctly links the noun to what is lacking. Also 'bike' should be plural or replaced with 'cycling infrastructure.' Suggestion: Use correct prepositions like 'in' after 'investment' and use appropriate nouns ('cycling infrastructure').