Bike— Part 1 Relatório

Sugestão: Correct the basic grammar and give a direct, natural response. Start with a clear topic sentence that answers the question, then add one or two specific supporting details. Avoid incorrect verb use (e.g., “I was a bike” is wrong) and keep the response concise (maximum 5 sentences).

Exemplo: Yes, I did. I had a small red bicycle that my parents bought for me when I was seven, and I used it to ride to school and around the neighborhood every day.

Sugestão: Organize your answer with a clear topic sentence, then give two concise, linked reasons with specific details and proper linking words. Reduce filler words (uh, um) and correct grammar (e.g., “cheaper compared to cars” and clarify the second reason). Use linking words such as “first” and “second” properly. Keep it within 3–4 sentences.

Exemplo: Yes, they are very popular. First, bicycles are much cheaper than cars, so many people choose them to save money. Second, they are convenient for short trips in crowded cities because they are easy to park and often faster during rush hour.

× Yes, I was a bike when I was a child.

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a child.

The student used the wrong verb/pronoun structure: 'was a bike' implies the speaker became a bicycle. This is an incorrect use of verbs/pronouns referring to possession. The correct verb to indicate possession is 'have' in past tense: 'had'. Suggestion: use 'had' for possession in past (I had a bike).

× There are many reason for that

✓ There are many reasons for that

The noun 'reason' must be plural to match 'many'. 'Many' requires a plural count noun. Also 'There are' correctly matches plural. Suggestion: change 'reason' to 'reasons'.

× First of all, uh uh, there are umm, cheap comparison to car and the second thing is uh they uh, are not uh, wanted to.

✓ First of all, they are cheap compared to cars, and secondly, they are not difficult to maintain.

Multiple issues exist: 'cheap comparison to car' is ungrammatical—use 'cheap compared to cars' (comparative structure) and plural 'cars'. 'The second thing is... are not wanted to' is incorrect structure and meaning. Likely intended meaning is that bikes are not difficult to maintain or not expensive to use; I corrected to 'not difficult to maintain'. Also improve linking: use 'First of all' then 'and secondly' for clearer structure. Suggestions: use 'cheap compared to cars' for comparisons and form the second point with a clear adjective or verb phrase (e.g., 'not difficult to maintain' or 'not expensive to run').