Building— Part 1 Relatório

Sugestão: 回答は意味が通じますが、文法の誤りと冗長さが見られます。例えば “there are not any high rise buildings” は自然には “there aren’t any high-rise buildings” と言い、同じ文の中で “although we can enjoy watching buildings, there are a lot of leafy areas” はつながりが不自然です。短く明確な主文（topic sentence）を使い、その後に一つか二つの具体的な詳細をリンク語（however / but / because / so）でつなげてください。また “leafy areas” の説明を具体化するとより良いです。

Exemplo: No, there aren’t any high-rise buildings near my home because I live in the countryside. Instead, the area is full of trees and small houses, so I enjoy quiet walks in green parks.

Sugestão: 意図は伝わりますが、語彙と文法の誤りが目立ちます。“hardly ever” と “no” の組み合わせは冗長で、 “high skyscrapers” は不自然です。また “take up take landmarks like Tokyo Sky 3” は言い直しが必要です。代わりに、頻度表現を一つに絞り、旅行中に撮る具体的な被写体を明確に述べてください。

Exemplo: I hardly ever photograph buildings, especially tall skyscrapers. However, when I travel I often take pictures of famous landmarks, such as Tokyo Skytree, because they capture the character of the city.

Sugestão: 主旨は明確ですが、文の構造が混乱しています（“since I was a I am a” 等）。理由を述べるときは簡潔にし、具体的な建物名や理由（例えば特定の寺院や歴史的特徴）を一つ挙げると説得力が増します。最後の文は不要に感じられるので、代わりに訪れたい理由や期待する経験を説明してください。

Exemplo: Yes, I would love to visit Kyoto, especially its historic temples like Kinkaku-ji, because I am a big fan of Japanese history and traditional architecture. I want to see the wooden structures and gardens up close.

Sugestão: 意見ははっきりしていますが、語法と文法の改善が必要です。“prefer to live lower buildings” は “prefer living in low-rise buildings” または “prefer to live in a low-rise building” が自然です。理由を述べる際は “when accidents and disasters happen” のように時制と語順を直し、加えて一つ別の理由（例えば眺めや管理のしやすさ）を補足すると良いです。

Exemplo: No, I wouldn’t want to live in a tall building. I prefer living in low-rise houses because evacuation can be difficult during emergencies, and they often feel more cosy and easier to maintain.

× No, there are not any high rise buildings as I'm living in the countryside, although we can enjoy watching buildings, there are a lot of leafy areas.

✓ No, there are no high-rise buildings because I live in the countryside; although we can see some buildings, there are many leafy areas.

'There are not any' is grammatically acceptable but 'there are no' is more natural here; 'high rise' should be hyphenated as 'high-rise' when used as a compound adjective; 'as I'm living' is awkward for a general fact — use simple present 'I live'; 'enjoy watching buildings' is unnatural — use 'see' or 'view'; 'there are a lot of leafy areas' is acceptable but 'many leafy areas' is more concise. Suggestion: use simple present for general facts, use hyphenation for compound adjectives, and prefer natural verbs like 'see' for perception.

× No, I hardly ever take pictures of high skyscrapers.

✓ No, I hardly ever take pictures of skyscrapers.

'High skyscrapers' is redundant because 'skyscraper' already implies a very tall building; place the adverb 'hardly ever' before the main verb 'take' is correct. Suggestion: remove unnecessary modifiers and keep adverb position before the verb.

× However, when I go to travel I tend to take up take landmarks like Tokyo Sky 3.

✓ However, when I travel I tend to take photos of landmarks like Tokyo Skytree.

'Go to travel' is incorrect; use 'travel' or 'go traveling'. 'Take up take' is a repetition and should be 'take photos of'. 'Tokyo Sky 3' seems to be a mistaken name — likely 'Tokyo Skytree'. Suggestion: simplify 'when I travel' and use the correct verb phrase 'take photos of' and correct landmark names.

× Yes, I'd like to visit buildings in Kyoto since I was a I am a big fan of Japanese history.

✓ Yes, I'd like to visit buildings in Kyoto because I am a big fan of Japanese history.

Mixing 'since I was a' and 'I am' creates a fragment and tense mismatch. Use 'because I am' to give a present reason for a present desire. Suggestion: avoid mixing past fragments with present statements; use a single clear reason clause.

× I think I have to work more and more to go to travel and enjoy it.

✓ I think I have to work harder to be able to travel and enjoy it.

'Work more and more' is awkward; 'work harder' is natural. 'Go to travel' is incorrect — use 'travel' or 'be able to travel'. Suggestion: use 'work harder' and 'be able to travel' to express purpose/ability.

× Definitely no. I prefer to live lower buildings.

✓ Definitely not. I prefer to live in lower buildings.

'Definitely no' is acceptable in short answers but 'definitely not' is more natural here. The phrase 'live lower buildings' is missing the preposition 'in' and sounds ungrammatical; use 'live in lower buildings'. Suggestion: include necessary prepositions and use 'definitely not' for negative preference.

× This is because it is challenging to escape from tall buildings when accidents and disasters are happened.

✓ This is because it is challenging to escape from tall buildings when accidents or disasters happen.

'Are happened' is incorrect passive; 'happen' is intransitive and should be in active form. Use 'accidents or disasters happen'. Also 'escape from tall buildings' is fine. Suggestion: avoid incorrect passive constructions with intransitive verbs and use present simple 'happen' for general statements.