Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Câu trả lời quá ngắn và thiếu thông tin chi tiết. Hãy bắt đầu bằng một câu chủ đề rõ ràng rồi tiếp tục với 1–2 câu bổ sung nêu rõ loại xe, kỷ niệm hoặc tần suất sử dụng để làm câu trả lời tự nhiên và ý nghĩa hơn. Sử dụng liên từ (for example, because, so) để nối các ý và tránh trả lời một từ.

예시: Yes, I did. I had a red mountain bike that my parents bought me when I was eight, and I rode it almost every day after school. For example, I often went to the park with my friends and practised riding up small hills to build confidence.

제안: Câu trả lời có ý nhưng ngôn ngữ sai và thiếu chi tiết cụ thể. Sửa ngữ pháp (“not as much as they used to be”), rồi mở rộng bằng lý do và ví dụ cụ thể (thay đổi lối sống, giao thông công cộng, trẻ em chơi ít hơn). Dùng liên từ (because, however, therefore) để làm cho lập luận mạch lạc hơn.

예시: I think bikes are less popular now than they used to be because more people prefer cars and public transport. However, interest is growing again in some cities due to bike lanes and environmental awareness; for example, my city recently built new cycle paths that more commuters are starting to use.

× To be honest, not as much as they not used to be.

✓ To be honest, not as much as they used to be.

The error is caused by incorrect placement and form of the auxiliary verb 'did'/'used'. In English, the correct expression for past habitual situations is 'used to' (not 'not used to' with an extra 'they'). The original sentence contains an extra 'they' and wrong word order 'they not used to be'. The correct negative comparison is either 'not as much as they used to be' or 'not as much as they did in the past'. Suggestion: Use the fixed phrase 'used to' after the subject ('they used to be') and place 'not as much as' before the clause to make the comparison. Also avoid inserting 'not' between subject and 'used to' when making this structure.