Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Votre réponse est compréhensible mais contient des erreurs grammaticales et manque de détails. Améliorez la structure en utilisant le passé correct («I had») et fournissez une phrase principale suivie d’un ou deux détails pertinents (par exemple, où vous l’utilisiez, qui vous l’a offert, ou un souvenir). Utilisez des mots de liaison simples si vous ajoutez une seconde phrase (par exemple «and», «because», «so»). Limitez-vous à 2–4 phrases pour rester naturelle.

예시: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I used it every day to ride to my friend’s house and to the park because it was the easiest way to get around.

제안: La réponse est confuse et non naturelle. Commencez par une phrase directe qui répond à la question (Yes/No) et suivez avec des raisons claires et spécifiques. Utilisez des mots de liaison pour organiser vos idées (for example, however, because, although). Évitez les répétitions inutiles et fournissez 1–2 détails concrets (statements about infrastructure, culture or statistics).

예시: Not really. Bicycles are less common in my city because public transport and cars are more convenient, and there are few bike lanes for safe riding.

× Yes, I have a bike when I was a child.

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was a child.

The speaker mixes present tense 'have' with a past-time clause 'when I was a child'. Use past tense 'had' to match the past time frame. Suggestion: use past simple for completed past situations (I had a bike when I was a child).

× No, no, no, no bike is normal.

✓ No, bicycles are common.

The original sentence is ungrammatical and awkwardly structured. It repeats 'no' and uses 'no bike is normal', which does not convey the intended meaning. Use a clear subject and adjective: 'bicycles are common' or 'bikes are common' to state popularity. If intending negativity: 'No, bikes are not common.' Ensure subject-verb agreement and correct word order.