Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 回答过于简短，缺乏展开与细节。应该先用一句主题句直接回答问题，然后用一到两句补充原因或回忆，并使用连接词使回答更连贯。例如说明为何没有自行车、如何代替出行或是否后来有过类似经历。注意不要超过五句。

예시: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. Instead, I usually walked or took the bus to school because my family lived relatively close to town. Occasionally my friends let me borrow theirs, which felt exciting at the time.

제안: 回答过于简短且缺乏具体细节与理由。应先直接回答，然后用一到两句具体解释为什么（如通勤、健康、环境、城市基础设施等），并用连接词如“because”或“for example”使逻辑更清晰。提供简单对比或例子会提高说服力。

예시: Yes, I think bikes are quite popular in my country because many people use them for short commutes and to avoid traffic. For example, in larger cities there are dedicated bike lanes and bike-sharing programs that make cycling convenient and affordable.

× No.

✓ No.

对话中学生回答“No.”作为简短回答是语法正确且符合上下文的用法，不需要修改。简短回答常见且完全可接受。

× Yes.

✓ Yes.

学生对第二个问题回答“Yes.”是语法正确的简短回答，符合对话情境，不需要更改。