Reading— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: ปรับความชัดเจนและความเป็นธรรมชาติ: หยุดใช้เสียงเติม (umm, mmm) และตอบตรงประเด็นด้วยประโยคหัวข้อ จากนั้นให้รายละเอียดประกอบ เช่น ประเภทหนังสือที่ชอบหรือเหตุผล วลีเชื่อมควรใช้เมื่อให้รายละเอียดเพิ่มเติม เช่น "however", "when it comes to" เพื่อทำให้คำตอบลื่นไหลและมีเหตุผลชัดเจน

예시: Not really, I don't read very often. However, when a book contains information I need, I enjoy reading it because it helps me solve specific problems or learn new skills. For example, I like reading technology guides when I want to improve my computer skills.

제안: ลดการพูดซ้ำและเติมคำ (hesitations) และจัดโครงสร้างให้ชัดเจน: ให้เริ่มด้วยประโยคหัวข้อที่ชัดว่าเลือกแบบไหนเป็นหลัก แล้วใช้คำเชื่อมเช่น "because" และ "however" เพื่ออธิบายความแตกต่างระหว่างความชอบและความถี่ ใช้คำศัพท์เฉพาะเช่น "eye strain" และ "convenient" แทนคำทั่วไป

예시: I generally prefer reading on paper because it causes less eye strain and feels more comfortable. However, I read more often on a screen since it's more convenient and readily available on my devices.

제안: ตอบให้ตรงและเจาะจงมากขึ้น: เริ่มด้วยประโยคหัวข้อที่ระบุสถานการณ์ที่ต้องอ่านละเอียด เช่น "when reading contracts or study materials" แล้วอธิบายเหตุผลและยกตัวอย่าง ใช้คำเชื่อมเช่น "for example" และ "because" เพื่อเชื่อมแนวคิด และหลีกเลี่ยงประโยคกำกวม

예시: You need to read carefully when the material is important or detailed, for example contracts, academic articles, or instructions, because mistakes can be costly. For casual content like social media posts or short news headlines, skimming is usually enough.

제안: ชัดเจนและให้เหตุผลเป็นระบบ: เริ่มด้วยการระบุความชอบแบบชัด เช่น "I prefer scanning" แล้วอธิบายเหตุผลโดยใช้คำเชื่อม "because" และยกตัวอย่างสถานการณ์ที่ใช้ทั้งสองวิธี นอกจากนี้ปรับไวยากรณ์และคำศัพท์ให้ถูกต้อง เช่น "it's more effective when you need to read quickly"

예시: I prefer scanning because it helps me find key information quickly, especially when I'm short on time. However, I use detailed reading for complex texts like textbooks or reports when I need to understand everything thoroughly.

× But if it comes to the book that I love, uh, about info that I want to know, Yeah, I think I would love to.

✓ But if it comes to a book that I love, about information that I want to know, I think I would love it.

The sentence lacked the appropriate article before 'book' and needed a pronoun for 'love'. Use 'a book' for nonspecific singular noun and add 'it' to complete the verb 'love'. Also expand 'info' to 'information' for formality. Suggestion: use 'a' for singular countable nouns and include object pronouns after verbs that require them.

× I think, I think I prefer reading on papers more than computer because it's, it's more umm, it's more kind to your eyes more than computer.

✓ I prefer reading on paper more than on a computer because it is kinder to your eyes than a computer screen.

'Papers' is incorrect for the general medium; use 'paper' as an uncountable medium. 'Computer' needs an article when referenced as a device ('a computer') and better phrasing is 'computer screen'. 'Kind' should be comparative 'kinder' when comparing two things. Suggestion: use uncountable nouns for materials (paper), include articles for singular countable nouns, and use comparative adjectives for comparisons.

× But if if you ask that umm, which is more frequency for me, I, I think computer does.

✓ But if you ask which is more frequent for me, I think I use the computer more often.

'More frequency' is incorrect; use the adjective 'more frequent' or adverb 'more often'. Also 'computer does' is colloquial and incomplete; 'I use the computer more often' is clear. Suggestion: choose correct adjective/adverb forms and provide a full clause with subject and verb.

× I think it depends on situation that you're on, but in my opinion you have to analyze seeing it yourself.

✓ I think it depends on the situation you are in, but in my opinion you have to see and analyze it yourself.

'Depends on situation that you're on' is awkward; use 'depends on the situation you are in'. 'Analyze seeing it yourself' mixes verbs incorrectly; separate actions: 'see and analyze it yourself' or 'analyze it yourself after seeing it.' Suggestion: use natural prepositional phrases ('in the situation') and keep verb complements parallel.

× In that situation, I can really tell about when you should read carefully or when not.

✓ In that situation, I can clearly say when you should read carefully and when you should not.

'Tell about when' is unnatural; use 'say when' or 'explain when'. Also provide full clauses for both parts: 'when you should read carefully' and 'when you should not.' Suggestion: use parallel clause structure and clearer verbs like 'say' or 'explain.'

× Then I will, I will always prefer scanning more than detailed reading because it's, it's called this, this time, this time to read.

✓ I will always prefer skimming to detailed reading because it saves time when reading.

Use 'prefer A to B' structure (not 'prefer A more than B'). 'Scanning' is less natural than 'skimming' in this context. The phrase 'it's called this time to read' is unclear; likely meant 'it saves time'. Suggestion: use correct prefer construction and idiomatic verbs (skim), and express purpose/result clearly.

× And I think it's more effective when it's come to umm, fast reading or you have that much time in that.

✓ And I think it is more effective when it comes to fast reading or when you do not have much time.

'When it's come to' is incorrect; correct phrase is 'when it comes to'. 'You have that much time in that' is ungrammatical; intended meaning is 'you do not have much time.' Suggestion: use fixed expressions ('when it comes to') and rephrase awkward time expressions into standard forms.