Band 7 Example

Question: Why are there people who like a law but want to change part of it?

Idea 1

Adaptation to Modern Needs
Model Answer
People might like a law but want to change it because society changes over time. As new technologies come up or society evolves, some laws might not fit anymore. People want laws that match today's values and needs. By updating them, laws can stay useful and effective for everyone.
People may appreciate the essence of a law but seek modifications due to the dynamic nature of society. As society progresses and new technologies emerge, existing laws can become obsolete or inadequate. Individuals often desire laws that align with contemporary values and societal norms. By revising these laws, they can ensure that the legal framework remains relevant and effective in addressing current issues.
Grammar Analysis
1.Cause and effect structure: "People may appreciate the essence of a law but seek modifications due to the dynamic nature of society" uses a cause and effect structure to explain why people may want to change a law, adding depth and clarity to the explanation. 2.Relative clause: "As society progresses and new technologies emerge, existing laws can become obsolete or inadequate" uses a relative clause to provide additional information about the situation, enhancing the complexity and richness of the sentence. 3.Present participle phrase as an adverbial: "By revising these laws, they can ensure that the legal framework remains relevant and effective" uses a present participle phrase as an adverbial to describe the action, showcasing advanced grammar skills.
Vocabulary
  • essence of a law
  • dynamic nature of society
  • new technologies emerge
  • obsolete or inadequate
  • contemporary values and societal norms
  • legal framework remains relevant and effective
  • addressing current issues

Idea 2

Improving Fairness and Justice
Model Answer
Some people like a law but want to change it to make it fairer. Sometimes, parts of a law might seem unfair or biased. By changing these parts, people can fix inequalities or loopholes. This way, the law can protect vulnerable groups better and serve justice more effectively.
Individuals may support a law in principle but advocate for changes to enhance fairness and justice. Certain aspects of a law might be perceived as unjust or biased, prompting calls for amendments. By addressing these concerns, people aim to rectify inequalities or close loopholes. Such changes can better protect vulnerable groups and ensure that the law serves justice more comprehensively and equitably.
Grammar Analysis
1.Modal verbs for possibility: "might be perceived" uses the modal verb "might" to express possibility, adding nuance and complexity to the sentence. 2.Infinitive phrase as adverbial: "to enhance fairness and justice" uses an infinitive phrase as an adverbial to explain the purpose of advocating for changes, enhancing the clarity and depth of the sentence. 3.Present participle as a modifier: "prompting calls for amendments" uses the present participle "prompting" as a modifier to describe the cause-and-effect relationship, adding complexity to the sentence structure. 4.Adjective phrase as a postmodifier: "more comprehensively and equitably" uses an adjective phrase as a postmodifier to describe how the law should serve justice, enhancing the expressiveness and precision of the language.
Vocabulary
  • advocate for changes
  • fairness and justice
  • unjust or biased
  • rectify inequalities
  • close loopholes
  • protect vulnerable groups
  • comprehensively and equitably

Idea 3

Balancing Interests
Model Answer
People might like a law but want to change it to balance different interests. Laws often try to balance competing needs, and while people might agree with the main idea, they might not like some details. By adjusting these specifics, the law can better accommodate different views and become more acceptable to more people.
While individuals may agree with the overarching intent of a law, they might seek changes to better balance competing interests. Laws often aim to reconcile diverse perspectives, and while the core principle may be sound, specific provisions might not satisfy everyone. By refining these details, the law can more effectively accommodate various viewpoints, making it more palatable and acceptable to a broader audience.
Grammar Analysis
1.Complex sentence structure: "While individuals may agree with the overarching intent of a law, they might seek changes to better balance competing interests." This sentence uses a complex structure with a subordinate clause introduced by "while," demonstrating advanced grammar skills. 2.Noun phrase as subject: "The core principle" serves as the subject of the sentence, showcasing the ability to use complex noun phrases effectively. 3.Present participle as an adjective: "Refining these details" uses the present participle "refining" as an adjective to describe the action, adding depth and complexity to the sentence. 4.Causative structure: "Making it more palatable and acceptable to a broader audience" uses a causative structure to explain the result of refining the law, demonstrating a sophisticated understanding of grammar.
Vocabulary
  • overarching intent
  • balance competing interests
  • reconcile diverse perspectives
  • core principle
  • refining these details
  • accommodate various viewpoints
  • palatable and acceptable
  • broader audience