自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: 回答不自然且時態錯誤，內容過於簡短且沒有細節。建議使用正確的過去時，先直接回答，再補充一到兩句具體細節，如為何沒有腳踏車或童年如何出行，並使用連接詞使敘述流暢。保持總句數不超過五句。

範例: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child. My family couldn't afford one, so I usually walked to school or took the bus. Sometimes I borrowed a bike from a neighbor to ride in the park on weekends.

建議: 回答過於簡短且缺乏解釋。建議先給出直接觀點，然後用一兩句具體理由支持（例如交通基礎設施、城市規劃或安全問題），並用連接詞如 because 或 however 來連接句子，使回答更完整且有說服力。

範例: I don't think bikes are very popular in my country. This is mainly because many cities lack safe bike lanes, so people prefer cars or public transport for convenience and safety.

× No, I don't have a bike.

✓ No, I didn't have a bike.

学生回答是在谈论过去（when you were a child），因此应该使用过去时。原句使用了一般现在时（don’t have），与提问的时间状语“when you were a child”时态不一致。改为“didn't have”以匹配过去时。建议：遇到描述过去的情况时，使用一般过去时（did + 动词原形）。

× No, I don't think so.

✓ No, I didn't think so.

考官问的是“Do you think bikes are popular in your country?”（现在时），学生回答使用“No, I don't think so.”按表面看是对现在时的正确回应。但若考生想表达对过去的看法（例如在小时候是否流行），则需用过去时。鉴于上下文前一句涉及过去（childhood），若意图一致，应使用过去时“didn't think”。否则若确实回答现在的看法，原句可保留。建议：明确时间参照，若指现在用“I don't think so.”，若指过去用“I didn't think so.”。