自行车— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Your answer did not address the examiner's question and contained pronunciation/word choice errors. First, answer directly with a simple past statement (e.g., “Yes, I did” or “No, I didn’t”). If you provide more detail, add one or two supporting sentences using linking words (because/so/when) and keep it within 3–5 sentences. Also pay attention to pronunciation: 'bike' vs 'bite'.

範例: Yes, I did. I had a small blue bike when I was about seven because my parents wanted me to exercise. However, I stopped riding it often after I started secondary school because I got busy with studies and lived farther from my friends' houses.

建議: Your answer is relevant but needs clearer grammar, more precise vocabulary and better organization. Begin with a clear topic sentence (e.g., “Yes, bikes are very popular”). Then give two specific reasons using linking words (because/therefore/also). Correct grammar (subject-verb agreement: 'people use bikes') and replace unclear phrase 'gas prices are popular' with 'fuel is expensive'. Avoid filler words (uh, umm) and keep it concise (2–4 sentences).

範例: Yes, bikes are very popular in my country. Because the roads and public transport are not well developed, many people use bicycles or motorbikes to get around. Also, bikes are much cheaper to buy and maintain than cars, and fuel is expensive, so riding a bike saves money.

× Did you have a bite when you were tired?

✓ Did you have a bike when you were a child?

The student misheard or typed 'bite' and 'tired' instead of the intended response to the examiner's question. This is a sentence structure/content error rather than a standard grammatical category in the provided list, so classify it as 'Sentence structure errors' (ID 26). Correction restores the meaning and appropriate tense: 'Did you have a bike when you were a child?' Use 'child' to match the examiner's question and past simple for a past situation. Suggestion: Listen carefully to the examiner's question and repeat key words before answering if uncertain. If you meant something different, use clear nouns (bike) and time expressions (when you were a child).

× My country roads and infrastructure is not so developed, so many people uses bikes and the price rate is also uh, lower than cars.

✓ The roads and infrastructure in my country are not very developed, so many people use bikes and prices are also lower than for cars.

Multiple grammar issues: subject-verb agreement and article/order. 'My country roads and infrastructure' is awkward; better: 'The roads and infrastructure in my country'. The compound subject 'roads and infrastructure' is plural, so use 'are' (ID 27 Subject-verb agreement errors). 'Many people uses' is incorrect; plural subject 'people' takes the base verb 'use' (ID 2 Third person singular issue / ID 27 subject-verb agreement). 'The price rate is also lower than cars' is ungrammatical: 'prices are lower than for cars' or 'the price of bikes is lower than that of cars' (article and comparison issues). Suggestion: ensure plural subjects take plural verbs, and compare using parallel structures ('lower than for cars' or 'lower than those of cars').

× Gas prices are popular umm, in my country.

✓ Gas prices are high in my country.

'Popular' is the wrong adjective for prices; prices cannot be 'popular'. This is an issue of incorrect word choice/collocation, classified here as 'Incorrect use of adjectives or adverbs' (ID 13). The intended meaning is likely that gas prices are high or expensive, so use 'high' or 'expensive'. Suggestion: choose adjectives that collocate with 'prices' (high, low, expensive, affordable) and avoid 'popular' which describes people or items, not prices.