聊天— Part 1 評分報告

建議: Make the response more concise and natural. Start with a clear topic sentence, avoid repetition, correct grammar (e.g., "catch up with them about my day"), and limit to 2–3 supporting details. Use linking words like "usually" or "often" to show frequency.

範例: I don't chat with everyone, but I usually catch up with one or two close friends about my day. For example, I often message a best friend in the evening to share highlights or to ask how their day went.

建議: Organize the answer clearly: give a topic sentence, then two specific contrasting examples. Avoid repetition and fix grammar (e.g., "I talk about what is going on in their lives"). Use linking words such as "whereas" or "on the other hand" for contrast.

範例: With close friends I usually talk about everyday things, like work, hobbies or small events that happened that day. On the other hand, when I speak with friends I don't contact often, I ask about major life updates, such as job changes or family news, to catch up.

建議: Provide a clear topic sentence and one or two reasons with specific details. Replace informal phrases with smoother language and use a linking word to add a reason, e.g., "because" or "since." Keep it within 3–4 sentences.

範例: I prefer chatting one-on-one because it's easier to have a deep, personal conversation. For example, in a one-on-one chat we can talk privately about problems or plans, which is harder to do in a large group.

建議: Make the answer clearer and correct grammatical errors. Start with your preference, then give two specific reasons with linking words such as "because" and "so." Avoid vague phrases like "that kind of time is hardly well."

範例: I prefer communicating via social media because I am very busy and it saves time. For instance, quick messages let me check in during short breaks, so I can stay in touch more regularly without scheduling face-to-face meetings.

建議: Respond with a concise topic sentence and two clear supporting points: why arguments happen and how they are resolved. Fix grammar and remove redundancy. Use linking words such as "when" and "however" to show contrast and consequence.

範例: Yes, we sometimes argue when we have disagreements, especially about opinions or plans. However, these arguments are usually constructive because we listen to each other and reach a better understanding by the end.

× I don't like to chat with all my friends, but I have one or two best friends whom I really like to catch up my day with them at the end of the day or generally during the start of the day.

✓ I don't like to chat with all my friends, but I have one or two best friends with whom I really like to catch up at the end of the day or sometimes at the start of the day.

The phrase 'catch up my day with them' uses incorrect prepositions and word order. Use 'catch up with someone' and place time expressions after the verb: 'catch up with them at the end of the day.' Also use 'with whom' for formal correctness when 'whom' is the object of the preposition. Suggestions: say 'catch up with someone' and position time phrases after the verb phrase.

× With my close friends, as I chat regularly, it is just a day-to-day conversation about how the day was spent and what was new in the day.

✓ With my close friends, since I chat regularly, it is just a day-to-day conversation about how the day was and what was new.

The phrase 'how the day was spent' is awkward for describing daily smalltalk; 'how the day was' is more natural. The original also repeats 'in the day' unnecessarily. Suggest simplifying to 'how the day was' and remove redundancy.

× Otherwise, if I talk to my friends who are whom I don't chat regularly, I talk about what talk about what is going on in their life just to catch up with their life.

✓ If I talk to friends I don't contact regularly, I talk about what is going on in their lives just to catch up.

The sentence contains redundant and incorrect pronoun usage ('who are whom') and repeated phrases ('talk about what talk about what'). Also 'life' should be plural 'lives' when referring to multiple friends. Suggestions: remove 'who are'/'whom', avoid repetition, and use 'lives' for plural.

× I prefer to chat with only one friend because I think for me chatting is a conversation among two people just to know what is going on in our lives.

✓ I prefer to chat with only one friend because I think chatting is a conversation between two people to find out what is going on in their lives.

Use 'between' for two people rather than 'among'. Also 'for me' is unnecessary and awkwardly placed. Use 'find out' instead of 'know' for clarity, and 'their lives' agrees better when speaking generally. Suggest: 'chatting is a conversation between two people.'

× But group chatting I'm not very fond of.

✓ But I'm not very fond of group chatting.

Word order is incorrect; subject and auxiliary verb should precede the complement. Move 'I'm' before the complement: 'I'm not very fond of group chatting.'

× As these days time is little and we are really busy in our own life so I prefer doing communicating through social media.

✓ These days we have little time and are very busy with our own lives, so I prefer communicating through social media.

'Time is little' is not idiomatic; use 'have little time.' 'Busy in our own life' should be 'busy with our own lives.' 'Doing communicating' is incorrect; use the verb 'communicating' alone. Suggestions: use 'have little time,' 'busy with,' and a simple verb form.

× It saves my time and it makes me more regular with chatting rather than meeting face to face because it is that kind of time is hardly well.

✓ It saves me time and makes me more consistent in chatting rather than meeting face to face because face-to-face meetings are hard to arrange.

Phrases like 'saves my time' (prefer 'saves me time') and 'more regular with chatting' (use 'more consistent in chatting') are incorrect. The clause 'it is that kind of time is hardly well' is ungrammatical; replace with 'face-to-face meetings are hard to arrange.' Suggestions: use natural collocations like 'saves me time' and 'hard to arrange.'

× Yes, we generally have.

✓ Yes, we generally do.

The response 'we generally have' lacks an object; likely intended 'we generally do' (do have arguments). Use 'do' to stand in for the full verb phrase 'have arguments' or explicitly say 'we generally have arguments.' Suggest: 'Yes, we generally do' or 'Yes, we usually argue.'

× Whenever we have a disin agreement on something, we do indulge into an argu argument.

✓ Whenever we have a disagreement about something, we do indulge in an argument.

Several issues: 'disin agreement' is a misspelling of 'disagreement.' Use 'disagreement about' rather than 'on' or accept 'on' but 'about' is more natural. 'Indulge into' is incorrect; use 'indulge in.' Remove the repeated 'argu argument.' Suggestions: use correct verb-preposition pair 'indulge in' and correct spelling.

× But then that is fine.

✓ But that's fine.

This sentence is acceptable but wordy; contraction 'that's' is more natural in speech. No major grammar error; simplified for fluency.

× That's a part of being good friends and that is what we enjoy.

✓ It's part of being good friends, and that's something we accept.

'That's a part of being good friends' is okay, but 'that is what we enjoy' is slightly odd; 'accept' or 'put up with' fits better. Suggest revising for naturalness.

× At the end.

✓ In the end.

Use the idiom 'in the end' meaning 'ultimately.' 'At the end' requires an object or time reference (e.g., 'at the end of the day'). Suggest using 'in the end' here.

× One of us learns and learns something better and one of us reaches to a conclusion.

✓ One of us learns something new and the other reaches a conclusion.

'Learns and learns something better' is repetitive and awkward; use 'learns something new.' 'Reaches to a conclusion' should be 'reaches a conclusion' (no 'to'). Also clarify 'one of us' vs 'the other.' Suggestions: avoid repetition and remove unnecessary preposition.

× So I definitely argue with my friends whenever the conditions arise.

✓ So I definitely argue with my friends when the situation arises.

'Whenever the conditions arise' is slightly awkward; 'when the situation arises' is more natural. Tense is fine (present simple for habitual action). Suggest using 'when the situation arises.'