自行车— Part 1 评分报告

建议: 回答时时态不一致且信息较少。应使用过去时描述童年经历，并在主题句后补充一到两句具体细节（例如谁送的、什么时候学会骑、记忆片段或感受），使用连接词使表达更连贯。避免只用简单句。

示例: Yes, I did. When I was seven my parents bought me a small blue bike, and I learned to ride it in the park near our home. I remember feeling very proud when I could ride without training wheels, and my friends and I spent many afternoons cycling together.

建议: 回答逻辑清晰但过于简短，且用词可更自然。建议先给出总体看法，然后用至少一到两句具体原因和例子支持观点，并使用连接词（e.g. because, however, although）。可以提到城市地形、交通或替代出行方式来丰富内容。

示例: Not really. In my city, Chongqing, cycling isn't very popular because the hilly terrain and heavy traffic make it unsafe for many people. Instead, most residents prefer using buses, metro lines, or electric scooters, especially for longer commutes.

× Yes I do. I have a little blue bike.

✓ Yes, I did. I had a little blue bike.

原句时态与考官问题不匹配。考官问的是过去是否拥有（Did you have...），应使用一般过去时。学生回答中用的是现在时（I do / I have），这不符合已发生在过去的动作。建议：遇到以 Did 开头的问句，回答用过去时，例如 “Yes, I did.” 或者直接用过去式陈述 “I had...”。另外在书写或口语中在 Yes 后加逗号更自然。

× No, I live in Chongqing, China, a city with rolling mountains, so it's not safe to ride bikes.

✓ No. I lived in Chongqing, China, which is hilly, so it wasn't safe to ride bikes.

考官问题是一般现在时“Do you think bikes are popular...?” 学生给出的理由涉及对过去或持续情况的描述需注意时态一致性。原句开始用现在时‘I live’但前面回答为否定关于普及性的看法，若想说明过去或长期情况，应保持时态一致。此处更自然的表述是：如果指的是过去经常性的不安全，可以用过去时“lived/wasn't safe”；若是现在仍然如此，应保持现在时并调整句子为“it's hilly, so it's not safe to ride bikes.” 根据上下文选择时态。建议：确定你要表达的是过去还是现在，然后全句使用一致时态；用 which 引导定语从句比非限制性逗号短语更清晰。