自行车— Part 1 评分报告

建议: 回答过于简短，缺少结构和细节。建议先用主题句直接回答，然后用一到两句补充具体信息（如原因、情境或相关回忆），并使用连接词（如 because, so, but, however）使表达更连贯。注意总句数不超过5句，保持自然口语表达。

示例: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. I grew up in a small apartment building, so my parents thought it was unsafe for me to ride outside. Instead, I usually played in the nearby playground and walked to school with friends.

建议: 回答太简短且缺乏支持细节。建议先直接回答，然后用1–2句提供具体理由或例子，使用连接词（for example, because, therefore）使论述更有说服力。可提及普及程度、使用场景或变化趋势。

示例: Yes, I think bikes are very popular in my country because many people use them for short commutes and exercise. For example, in cities you can see dedicated bike lanes and bike-sharing programs that make cycling convenient and affordable.

× No.

✓ No.

学生回答“No.”作为简短回答是语法正确且符合语境（回答过去式问题“Did you have a bike when you were a child?”用简短否定回答“No.”完全合适）。因此无需修改。

× Yes.

✓ Yes.

学生回答“Yes.”作为简短回答是语法正确且符合语境（回答一般现在时问题“Do you think bikes are popular in your country?”用简短肯定回答“Yes.”完全合适）。因此无需修改。