Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: 回答は肯定しているが、時制や文法の誤り、繰り返しと間投詞（umm, uh）が多く、流暢さと正確さが欠けています。具体性も不足しています。改善策：1) 過去の習慣について話す際は過去形を使う（I had / I used to）2) 間投詞を減らして短く自然な文を作る3) 一文目で簡潔に答え、二文目で具体的な詳細（誰と乗ったか、何歳で乗れるようになったか、どこで練習したか、どれくらいで習得したか）を加える。例文を声に出して練習し、5センテンス以内に収める練習をしてください。

Ví dụ: Yes, I did. I had a bicycle when I was a child and I used to practice riding it in the park near my house. I learned to ride when I was about seven, mostly with my father helping me at first. After a few weeks of daily practice I could ride confidently without support. It became my favorite way to travel around the neighborhood.

Gợi ý: 意見は明確だが、表現が曖昧で断片的、文法と語順の誤り、繰り返しと間投詞が多いです。改善策：1) 明確な主張の後に理由を1〜2点具体的に述べる（例：交通渋滞、駐車場不足、公共交通の補完など）2) 接続詞（because, so, therefore, moreover）を適切に使って論理をつなぐ3) 文を完結にして冗長さを避ける。日常的な語彙を使い、例や比較を入れる練習をしてください。

Ví dụ: Yes, I think bicycles are quite popular, especially in cities like Kyoto. Because the streets are often crowded and parking is limited, many people find bikes more convenient than large cars. Bikes are also cheaper to maintain and useful for short trips, so they are common among students and commuters. As a result, cycling is a practical choice for everyday transportation.

× Oh yes, of course, I have a bike and I used to, umm, practice to, to, uh, using my bike and I finally succeed at it.

✓ Oh yes, of course. I had a bike and I used to practice using my bike, and I finally succeeded at it.

The student mixes present and past tenses incorrectly. The question asks about childhood, so past tense should be used consistently (had, used to, practiced, succeeded). 'Practice to using' is ungrammatical; the correct pattern is 'practice doing' (verb + -ing). 'Succeed' should be in the past form 'succeeded' to match the past context. Suggestion: Keep verbs in past tense for past habits and completed actions: 'had', 'used to practice', 'practiced/used to practice using', 'succeeded'.

× Oh yes, absolutely, because I live in Kyoto city and umm, it's very crowded city, so maybe the big car are not convenient to to have us to to to the transportation. So people.

✓ Oh yes, absolutely. I live in Kyoto city and it's a very crowded city, so maybe big cars are not convenient for transportation. So people...

There are several grammar issues: 'it's very crowded city' needs an article before 'very crowded city' (use 'a'). 'The big car are' has subject-verb agreement and article problems: 'car' should be plural 'cars' and verb agreement with plural would be 'are', but better phrasing is 'big cars are not convenient'. Also 'convenient to to have us to to to the transportation' is ungrammatical preposition/use; correct preposition is 'convenient for transportation' or 'convenient for people to use as transportation'. Suggestion: Use 'a very crowded city', make 'big cars' plural, and use 'convenient for transportation' or 'convenient for people to use'.