Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: Your answer is direct and appropriate but too short and lacks supporting details. To improve, add a brief topic sentence plus one or two specific supporting details (e.g., when you got it, who gave it to you, how often you used it, or a short memory). Keep it natural and under five sentences, and use a linking word if you add more than one detail.

Ví dụ: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I got it as a birthday present when I was eight, and I used it almost every day to ride to the park. It was a red, single-speed bike and I remember learning to ride with my father’s help.

Gợi ý: Your answer attempts to give reasons but contains unclear phrasing and grammar errors, and it lacks specific examples. Improve by stating your main idea clearly, then give one or two specific reasons with linking words (because, for example, therefore). Use precise vocabulary (e.g., inexpensive, economical, convenient, traffic) and complete sentences.

Ví dụ: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country because they are inexpensive to run and help people avoid heavy traffic. For example, many students and workers use bicycles to commute short distances since they save money on fuel and are easy to park.

× In my opinion, I think bikes are popular in my country because they don't pay for food and that stuff.

✓ In my opinion, I think bikes are popular in my country because they don't require people to pay for fuel and similar expenses.

The original sentence uses the pronoun 'they' to refer to 'bikes' but then attributes the action 'pay for food' to them, which is illogical. This is an incorrect use of pronouns and a semantic mismatch. Replace 'they don't pay for food and that stuff' with a clearer explanation such as 'they don't require people to pay for fuel and similar expenses' so the subject and agent align logically. Also 'that stuff' is vague; replace with a specific phrase. Suggestion: Ensure the pronoun refers to the correct agent and that the verb describes what bikes cause or require rather than what bikes themselves do.

× They can go around anywhere they want without.

✓ They can go anywhere they want without relying on public transport.

The original sentence ends with the preposition 'without' but lacks an object, creating an incomplete sentence and poor sentence structure. This is a sentence structure error because the phrase 'without' requires a noun or gerund phrase after it. Provide the missing element, for example 'without relying on public transport' or 'without restrictions.' Also 'go around anywhere' is wordy; 'go anywhere' is more natural. Suggestion: Complete prepositional phrases by supplying the necessary object and simplify redundant wording.