Bike— Part 1 Báo cáo

Gợi ý: You repeated the examiner's question instead of answering. For a direct response, give a clear topic sentence about whether you had a bike, then add one or two brief supporting details (age, who gave it to you, how often you used it). Keep it natural, avoid redundancy, and use linking words if you add details. Aim for 2–3 sentences and stay under five sentences.

Ví dụ: Yes, I did. I got my first bike when I was eight from my parents and rode it every afternoon to visit friends in the neighborhood.

Gợi ý: Your answer is short and direct but lacks supporting detail. Improve by stating your opinion clearly and then explaining why with specific reasons or examples (infrastructure, culture, weather, alternatives). Use a linking word to connect opinion and reason, and try to expand to 2–3 sentences while remaining natural.

Ví dụ: Not really — bikes aren’t very popular in my country because cities lack safe bike lanes and most people prefer cars for long commutes. As a result, cycling is mostly seen as a leisure activity rather than a daily mode of transport.

× Did you have a bike when you were a child?

✓ Yes, I did.

The original reply repeats the examiner's question rather than answering. This is a sentence structure/use issue: a response to a yes/no past question should use an appropriate past-tense answer (subject + did/didn't + base verb). Correct form: 'Yes, I did.' or 'No, I didn't.' Practice answering directly using auxiliary did for past simple questions.

× Bikes are not quite popular in my country.

✓ Bicycles are not very popular in my country.

The phrase 'not quite popular' is awkward in this context. Use 'very' to modify the adjective 'popular' and 'bicycles' is a more formal noun than 'bikes' in this sentence; this is an article/word-choice style issue. Also 'in my country' is fine. Suggestion: say 'Bicycles are not very popular in my country.' or 'Bikes are not very popular in my country.' for a more natural response.