Bike— Part 1 Relatório

Sugestão: Your answer is direct and concise, which is good, but it is too short and lacks supporting detail. To improve, add one or two brief specifics (reason, context or a short anecdote) and use a linking phrase to make it natural. Keep it within 3–4 sentences.

Exemplo: No, I didn't. My family couldn't afford one when I was young, so I usually walked to school instead. As a result, I became used to walking long distances and only learned to ride a bike much later.

Sugestão: Your answer gives an opinion but has grammatical errors, repetition and lacks specific supporting details. Improve by correcting grammar, removing repetition, using linking words (for example, 'because' or 'however'), and adding one concrete reason or example (e.g., city layout, weather, culture). Keep the response natural and within 3–4 sentences.

Exemplo: No, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because most people prefer cars and trains for convenience. For example, many cities have long commutes and limited cycling infrastructure, so biking is uncommon for daily travel.

× No, I don't think so 'cause most of the people in my country is more interested in cars and trains.

✓ No, I don't think so 'cause most of the people in my country are more interested in cars and trains.

The subject 'most of the people' is plural, so the verb must be plural 'are' instead of singular 'is'. Suggestion: identify the true subject (people) and ensure the verb agrees in number with it; use 'are' for plural subjects.

× They they're not actually interested in bikes and these things.

✓ They are not actually interested in bikes and similar things.

This sentence contains a repetition ('They they're') and an informally vague phrase ('these things'). Fix by removing the redundant contraction and using a clearer noun phrase. Suggestion: choose either 'they' or 'they're' and prefer 'similar things' or name the items explicitly for clarity.