Part 1
Examinador
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
Candidato
No, I don't have bike when I try because I I feel like bike I looks like bike really danger.
Examinador
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
Candidato
Yes, but Korean have haven't planned ground.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
Pontuação: 34.0Sugestão: 문법과 시제 사용을 교정하고 문장을 간결하게 표현하세요. 현재와 과거 시제를 혼용하지 말고, 중복 표현(예: "I I")을 제거하세요. 또한 이유를 보다 구체적으로 설명하고 연결어(for, because, so 등)를 사용해 논리를 명확히 하세요. 예를 들어 과거에는 자전거가 위험하다고 느꼈던 구체적 경험이나 이유(교통, 보호장비 부족 등)를 덧붙이면 좋습니다.
Exemplo: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because I thought cycling was dangerous. For example, there were many busy roads near my home and I rarely saw people wearing helmets, so my parents didn't allow me to ride one.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
Pontuação: 28.0Sugestão: 문장을 명확한 주어-동사 구조로 바꾸고, 단수/복수 및 관사 사용을 바로잡으세요. 또한 ‘planned ground’처럼 의미가 모호한 표현 대신 'bike lanes' 또는 'cycling infrastructure' 같은 정확한 어휘를 사용하세요. 이유와 구체적 예시(도시 vs 시골, 정부 정책, 인프라 부족 등)를 추가해 진술을 뒷받침하세요.
Exemplo: Yes, bikes are fairly popular in my country, especially in cities. However, there is a lack of well-planned bike lanes and safe cycling infrastructure, so many people prefer public transport or cars instead.
× No, I don't have bike when I try because I I feel like bike I looks like bike really danger.
✓ No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because I felt bikes were really dangerous.
Multiple tense and agreement errors: 'don't have' should be past 'didn't have' to match 'when you were a child'. Missing article: 'a bike'. 'when I try' is unclear and not appropriate; use 'when I was a child' to answer the question. Repeated 'I' removed. 'I feel like' should be past 'I felt' to match past context. 'bike I looks like bike really danger' has subject-verb agreement and article errors; corrected to 'bikes were really dangerous.' Suggestion: Maintain consistent past tense for childhood experiences, include appropriate articles ('a'/'the'), and ensure subject-verb agreement ('bikes were').
× Yes, but Korean have haven't planned ground.
✓ Yes, but Koreans don't have many designated cycling grounds.
Problems: subject form 'Korean' should be plural 'Koreans'. 'have haven't' is a contradictory and incorrect auxiliary combination; use a single correct auxiliary 'don't have' for present negative. 'planned ground' is unnatural; use 'designated cycling grounds' or 'planned cycling infrastructure'. Suggestion: Use correct plural nouns for people groups, avoid double auxiliaries, and choose natural noun phrases for facilities.