Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 你的回答过于简短且缺乏细节。评分规则要求先给出直接的主题句，然后在需要时用1–2句支持细节来丰富回答，并使用连接词保持连贯。建议在回答中说明是否拥有自行车，描述自行车的类型或用途，并给出一两个具体的回忆或原因。尽量控制在不超过5句内。

예시: Yes, I did. I had a small red bicycle with training wheels when I was about six, and I used it to ride to my friend’s house every afternoon. Because my neighborhood was quiet and safe, I learned to ride without the training wheels in just a few months.

제안: 回答太简短且没有解释原因或提供支持细节。根据评分规则，应先直接回答问题，然后用1–2句具体说明理由或提供比较、例子等支持，并使用连接词使表达连贯。建议说明为什么不流行（例如交通、天气、文化或基础设施因素），并可给出替代交通方式作为对比。

예시: Not really. In my country most people prefer cars or motorbikes because the weather can be unpredictable and there are few safe bike lanes in cities, so cycling isn’t very convenient for daily commuting.

× Yes.

✓ Yes.

该回答为单词“Yes.”作为对“Did you have a bike when you were a child?”的问题的肯定回答。此句为简短回答，语法正确，时态和形式均恰当，无需修改。

× No.

✓ No.

该回答为单词“No.”作为对“Do you think bikes are popular in your country?”的问题的否定回答。此句为简短回答，语法正确，时态和形式均恰当，无需修改。