Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 回答过于简短且缺乏细节。建议在回答时先给出直接回答的主句，然后补充一两句具体细节（例如原因、年龄或替代交通工具），并使用连接词使表达更自然流畅。尽量将回答控制在最多五句之内。

예시: No, I didn’t have a bike when I was a child. I grew up in a crowded city where my parents preferred I walk or take the bus for safety reasons. Sometimes I borrowed a cousin’s bike for short rides, but I never owned one myself.

제안: 句子有语法和表达错误，意思也不够清晰。建议先给出清晰的观点句，然后用一到两句具体理由或例子支持观点，使用连接词（例如 however, therefore, because）来增强连贯性，并注意时态和词汇搭配。

예시: I think bikes were more popular when I was younger, but that has changed recently. As the country has become wealthier, more people can afford cars and public transport has improved, so fewer people use bicycles for daily travel.

× When I was small, it was true, but as our country grows more economically stronger, it couldn't be.

✓ When I was small, that was true, but as our country has grown economically stronger, it isn't anymore.

问题类型：4（情态动词使用错误）。 解释（简体中文）：原句中“it couldn't be”用法不恰当。考官问的是现在自行车是否流行，学生想表达“以前是，但现在不再是”。在这种语境下应使用一般现在时或现在完成时来对比过去与现在的情况，而不是情态动词“could”加否定，且“couldn't be”暗示能力或推测的否定，意义不符。建议将前半句“When I was small, it was true”改为更自然的“That was true when I was young/when I was a child”，或保持原句；后半句用“has grown economically stronger”或“has become more economically developed”强调从过去到现在的变化，并用“isn't anymore”或“no longer is”表达“现在不再是”。另外，原句中“more economically stronger”也不正确，应改为“economically stronger”或“stronger economically”。具体改正已在上方给出。