Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Improve pronunciation and grammar (e.g., 'bike' vs 'bite', past tense 'had'), reduce hesitations (fillers like 'umm'), and make answers more concise and structured. Start with a clear topic sentence answering the question, then add 1–2 specific supporting details using linking words (for example, 'because' or 'so'). Aim for 2–3 sentences and use correct past tense and plural/singular forms.

예시: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I rode it often with my brother to the nearby convenience store and to the park because there were many shops and safe paths around our neighborhood. Those rides were a fun way for our family to spend time together.

제안: Be more direct and fluent: start with a clear opinion ('No, I don't think so'), then give 1–2 specific reasons using linking words ('because', 'for example'). Avoid unnecessary pauses and unclear phrases ('sky training state' is unclear). Use precise vocabulary (e.g., 'infrastructure', 'traffic', 'public transport'). Keep it to 2–3 sentences.

예시: No, I don't think bikes are very popular in my country because the roads and infrastructure favor cars and traffic can be dangerous for cyclists. For example, there are few dedicated bike lanes and many people prefer driving or using public transport.

× Did you bite when I was?

✓ Did you bike when you were a child?

The original sentence has incorrect word order and an incorrect verb 'bite' instead of 'bike'. 'Did you bike when you were a child?' matches the examiner's question form using simple past. Suggestion: use the correct verb 'bike' and include the subject 'you' with the past question form 'Did you' followed by the base verb 'bike'.

× Did you have bike when I was child?

✓ Did you have a bike when you were a child?

Missing article and incorrect pronoun/word order. Countable singular noun 'bike' requires the indefinite article 'a'. Use 'you were a child' to indicate the time reference. Suggestion: include 'a' before singular countable nouns and use the full clause 'when you were a child'.

× Yes, I have bite a lot when I was a child because there was a lot of convenience store UMM around my town.

✓ Yes, I biked a lot when I was a child because there were a lot of convenience stores around my town.

Multiple errors: 'have bite' mixes present perfect and wrong verb form; the intended past simple is 'biked'. Time phrase 'when I was a child' requires past simple. 'There was a lot of convenience store' has number and article errors: use plural 'stores' with 'a lot of' and plural agreement with 'were'. Suggestion: use past simple 'biked', pluralize 'stores', and use 'there were' for plural existence in the past.

× So I usually just bike with my brother to umm, to the store or even to the park just to having fun and having a great time with my family.

✓ So I usually just biked with my brother to the store or even to the park just to have fun and have a great time with my family.

Tense inconsistency: 'usually' with past context should use past simple 'biked'. 'to having fun' is incorrect after 'to' as an infinitive marker; use the base form 'to have fun'. Also match parallel structure: 'to have fun and have a great time'. Suggestion: maintain past tense throughout and use infinitive after 'to'.

× Uh, I do not think that, uh, bike is popular in my country because, uh, in my country, the road is not in the favor of biking and, and more of like a driving car.

✓ Uh, I do not think that bikes are popular in my country because the roads are not favorable for biking and cars are more common.

Subject-verb and number issues: 'bike is popular' should be plural 'bikes are popular'. 'the road is not in the favor of biking' is awkward; use plural 'roads are not favorable for biking'. 'more of like a driving car' is ungrammatical; replace with 'cars are more common' for clarity. Suggestion: use plural nouns when speaking generally and prefer 'favorable for' instead of 'in the favor of'.

× And the reason to that is because, umm, in Thailand we have umm, like a sky training state.

✓ And the reason for that is that in Thailand we have, like, a skytrain system.

Awkward phrase 'reason to that' should be 'reason for that'. 'is because' is redundant with 'reason'; better: 'the reason for that is that'. 'sky training state' is incorrect vocabulary; likely meant 'skytrain system' (an elevated rail transit). Suggestion: use 'the reason for that is that' and the correct term 'skytrain system'.