Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: 回答中出现了词语错误（bank vs bike），且回答过于简短、缺少细节。建议：首先注意发音和词汇准确，确认所用单词正确；其次给出一到两句具体细节来丰富内容（例如什么时候有的、是谁买的、你常去哪里骑车、为什么喜欢或不喜欢）。使用连接词使句子更自然流畅。

예시: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. My parents bought it for me when I was eight, and I used to ride it to the park every afternoon because it was easy to get there and fun to meet friends.

제안: 回答简洁但太简单，缺少支持细节和连接词。建议：在肯定或否定后补充具体原因或例子，比如谁骑车、在哪些城市或场合更常见、骑车的优缺点等。使用连接词（for example, because, especially）使回答更连贯。

예시: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country, especially in cities where traffic is heavy. For example, many students and office workers ride bikes to save time and avoid traffic jams, and some cities also have convenient bike-sharing schemes.

× Yes, I did have a bank.

✓ Yes, I did have a bike.

学生原句使用了单词“bank”（银行），而题目问的是“Did you have a bike when you were a child?”（你小时候有自行车吗？）。这里是词汇选择错误，而不是列表中明确的语法分类。根据指示只纠正列出的问题类型，但句子本身语法结构正确，只是词不达意。因此应将“bank”改为与问题对应的“bike”。建议：回答时注意重读考官问题中的关键词，确认所用名词与问题一致。