Bike— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Your answer is grammatical and direct, but it's very short and lacks supporting details. To improve, give a brief topic sentence and then add one or two specific reasons or a short anecdote using a linking word (for example, 'because' or 'so'). Keep it natural and within 3–5 sentences.

예시: No, I didn't have a bike when I was a child because my family couldn't afford one. As a result, I usually walked to school or took public transport, and I only learned to ride when I was a teenager.

제안: Your response answers the question but contains an error ('because but') and lacks clear development. To improve, correct the linking word usage and expand with a specific reason and a short example. Use linking words like 'because', 'so', or 'therefore' to make your point coherent, and avoid contradictions in the same clause.

예시: No, bikes are not very popular in my country because many people don't obey traffic rules. Therefore, cycling can feel unsafe in cities, and most families prefer cars or motorbikes instead.

× No, bikes are not popular in my country. I think it's because but people don't obey traffic rules.

✓ No, bikes are not popular in my country. I think it is because people do not obey traffic rules.

The original sentence contains a sentence structure error caused by the unnecessary conjunction 'but' following 'because', creating a fragment and interrupting the causal clause. Remove 'but' to form a correct because-clause: 'I think it is because people do not obey traffic rules.' Also expand the contraction 'it's' to 'it is' if a more formal register is preferred. Ensure subject-verb agreement in the negative present simple by using 'do not obey' rather than the contraction 'don't' if you want to avoid informality.