Names— Part 1 채점 보고서

제안: Your answer is unclear and contains grammatical errors, making it difficult to understand. Try to give a clear and direct response about the meaning of your name, followed by a brief explanation. Use simple and correct sentences to express your ideas naturally.

예시: Yes, my name has a special meaning. It was chosen by my parents because it represents strength and kindness, qualities they hope I will have as I grow up.

제안: Your answer is confusing and lacks coherence. Focus on directly answering how you would choose names, mentioning meaningful or cultural aspects. Use linking words to connect your ideas logically and keep sentences clear and concise.

예시: I would choose names that have meaningful cultural significance and reflect our family traditions. This way, the names would carry a special value and avoid any confusion.

제안: Your answer is somewhat understandable but contains grammatical mistakes and unclear phrases. Give a direct answer first, then explain why sharing a name is important or not. Use simple, correct sentences and avoid redundancy.

예시: No, no one in my family has the same name as me. I think this helps me maintain my own identity and makes me feel unique.

제안: Your answer is unclear and does not address the question properly. Try to clearly state the differences between past and present naming practices in China, giving specific examples. Use simple sentences and linking words to make your answer coherent.

예시: Yes, there are differences. In the past, Chinese names often included characters that expressed hopes for the child's future, while nowadays, parents may choose names that sound modern or are easier to pronounce.

제안: Your answer is not relevant and difficult to understand. Provide a clear response about popular names in China, mentioning examples and reasons for their popularity. Use correct grammar and vocabulary related to the topic.

예시: Yes, some names are more popular in China, such as 'Wei' and 'Li'. These names are common because they have positive meanings and are easy to pronounce.

× Yes, my name doesn't doesn't have a negative drive from an instant dwarf.

✓ Yes, my name doesn't have a negative meaning from an instant dwarf.

The sentence contains a repeated word 'doesn't' which is incorrect conjunction use. Removing the duplicate improves clarity and grammatical correctness.

× That means where the answer is for my parents how I would remember the as I grew up.

✓ That means, according to my parents, how I would remember it as I grew up.

The original sentence is confusing and lacks proper structure. Reordering and adding necessary words clarifies the meaning and corrects the sentence structure.

× I take out my bed my to live up to.

✓ I try to live up to it.

The original sentence is grammatically incorrect and unclear. Simplifying and correcting the phrase makes the sentence meaningful and grammatically correct.

× Then Justin minced 4 dimensions.

✓ Then, I considered four dimensions.

The original sentence is unclear and contains incorrect word usage. Replacing 'Justin minced' with 'I considered' and clarifying the meaning corrects the sentence structure.

× There's nothing else but considerably involved in factor.

✓ There is nothing else but considerably involved factors.

The phrase 'considerably involved in factor' is incorrect. Changing 'factor' to 'factors' and adjusting the sentence improves grammatical correctness.

× Firstly, I would really look for myself have meaningful organs or cultural dimension as if they had private family affairs and agency.

✓ Firstly, I would look for meaningful origins or cultural dimensions, especially if they have private family significance and heritage.

The original sentence is confusing and contains incorrect word choices like 'organs' instead of 'origins'. Rewriting the sentence clarifies the meaning and corrects the structure.

× So I have good moments and try to avoid confusion.

✓ So, I choose good names and try to avoid confusion.

The phrase 'have good moments' is incorrect in this context. Replacing it with 'choose good names' makes the sentence meaningful and grammatically correct.

× No, no one is my family says the same name as me.

✓ No, no one in my family has the same name as me.

The original sentence misuses pronouns and verb forms. Correcting 'is' to 'in' and 'says' to 'has' fixes the pronoun and verb agreement issues.

× My friends have decided to watch my family, guessing I think haven't got our business and that's for me to suggest my own identity.

✓ My friends have decided to watch my family, but I think I haven't got our business, and that's why I suggest my own identity.

The sentence is confusing and lacks proper conjunctions. Adding 'but' and 'and that's why' improves sentence flow and clarity.

× Yes, there are no applicable difference in Hawaiian newspaper in Jaipur's as compared to the faster than he means often useless via from the head of hope for the child's trigger, it becomes inspectors where the names from capsule Chandni Chihuahua and modern contains friends 2018.

✓ Yes, there are no applicable differences in naming practices in Hawaii compared to Jaipur, as names often reflect hopes for the child's future; modern names include influences from various cultures and trends as of 2018.

The original sentence is incoherent and contains many errors. Rewriting it with correct quantifiers and clearer structure conveys the intended meaning.

× Yes. Lead away from the day after remains greater than Geeta Deshmukh's role for Mumbai Sonam Kapoor as best precious factor that's envoyed with friends with fraction of society and their meaning in.

✓ Yes. Some names are more popular than others in China, influenced by cultural factors and societal preferences.

The original sentence is unclear and contains incorrect quantifiers and word usage. Simplifying and correcting quantifiers improves clarity and correctness.