Bike— Part 1 採点レポート

提案: Give a direct topic sentence then add 1–3 brief supporting details. Use linking words like “because” or “so” to make it coherent. Be specific (type of bike, how old you were, who gave it to you, how often you used it) and keep to a maximum of 5 sentences.

例: Yes, I did — I had a small red bicycle with training wheels when I was about six years old. I used it almost every day after school because my parents encouraged outdoor play, and I learned to ride without the training wheels by the time I was eight. Riding with friends in the neighborhood was one of my favorite childhood activities.

提案: Answer directly with a clear opinion, then explain with specific reasons and a linking word (e.g., “because”, “however”, “although”). Clarify the comparison (do you mean regular bicycles vs motorbikes?) and give brief evidence or examples (urban traffic, cost, culture). Keep answers concise and natural (1–4 sentences).

例: Not really — I think motorbikes are more popular than regular bicycles in my country because they are faster and more practical for commuting in heavy traffic. For example, many people use motorbikes to travel to work or the market, whereas bicycles are mainly used for exercise or by children.

× Not much as the motorbike or bicycle.

✓ Not as much as motorbikes or cars.

The original sentence incorrectly compares items and uses singular nouns in an unclear structure. This is a comparative problem: 'Not much as the motorbike or bicycle' is ungrammatical. Use 'Not as much as' followed by the things being compared in plural when speaking generally: 'motorbikes' or 'cars' (choose the appropriate comparison). Also 'the' is unnecessary before plural general nouns here. Suggestion: say 'Not as much as motorbikes or cars' to make a clear, grammatically correct comparison.