Bike— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: Be more concise, correct grammar, and organize your answer with a clear topic sentence plus one or two supporting details. Avoid double negatives and redundant phrasing. For example, use past tense consistently and explain briefly why you stopped using the bike (safety, skill). Use a linking word to connect ideas.

Ejemplo: Yes, I had a bike when I was a child. I used it often for fun and to ride around my neighborhood, but I stopped using it after I outgrew the training wheels because I didn’t feel confident riding without them.

Sugerencia: Start with a clear opinion, then give specific reasons and a short example. Fix grammar (e.g., "more faster" -> "faster"), avoid repetition, and use linking words (for example, however, therefore). Mention where you see scooters and who uses them to add specificity.

Ejemplo: I don't think bikes are very popular right now because electric scooters have become widespread in cities and they are faster and more convenient. For example, many commuters prefer scooters for short trips downtown, so I see far fewer cyclists on the main roads.

× Yes, I had a bike when I was just younger and I often use it, although I don't use it anymore because it doesn't have training wheels and I never adopted to no training wheels.

✓ Yes, I had a bike when I was younger and I often used it, although I don't use it anymore because it didn't have training wheels and I never adapted to no training wheels.

The sentence mixes past and present tenses inconsistently. 'was just younger' is awkward; use 'was younger'. 'I often use it' should be past 'I often used it' to match 'I had a bike'. 'doesn't have' should be past 'didn't have' because referring to the bike in the past. 'adopted to' is incorrect verb choice and preposition; the correct verb is 'adapted to'. Also double negative 'never ... no' is incorrect; keep single negative: 'never adapted to no training wheels' still contains 'no' which is informal; better: 'never adapted to riding without training wheels.' Suggestion: keep past tense consistently when talking about childhood and use correct verb 'adapt' and phrase 'riding without training wheels.'

× Not really because there is a massive expansion of E scooters and it's just taking over the entire city because it's more faster than bikes.

✓ Not really, because there has been a massive expansion of e-scooters and they're taking over the city because they're faster than bikes.

The original uses 'there is a massive expansion' which is acceptable but 'has been' better matches ongoing recent change; this is aspect rather than strict tense but improves accuracy. 'it's just taking over the entire city' can be pluralized to match 'e-scooters' so 'they're taking over the city.' 'more faster' is a comparative error: 'faster' already expresses comparative; using 'more' is redundant. Also 'E scooters' should be styled 'e-scooters.' Keep present continuous for ongoing trend: 'are taking' and present simple 'are faster'.

× Although there are some bikers here but in my opinion mostly I mostly see scooters.

✓ Although there are some bikers, in my opinion I mostly see scooters.

Using both 'although' and 'but' together is redundant; choose one. The sentence also repeats 'mostly' twice. Fix conjunction use by removing 'but' and remove duplicate adverb. Reordering to 'Although there are some bikers, in my opinion I mostly see scooters' makes the contrast clear and concise.