Chatting— Part 1 Informe

Sugerencia: 主張は明確で、友達の助言を聞く理由も述べられています。しかし、文が長く、接続詞や句読点が不足しているため、意味が伝わりにくくなっています。「when I cannot find a way out」は「when I’m stuck」のように自然に言い換え、「it can learn another perspective」は「it helps me see things from another perspective」と表現しましょう。主張→理由→効果の順に、2～3文で答えるとより効果的です。

Ejemplo: Yes, I really enjoy chatting with my friends, especially when I’m feeling stuck. I often ask for their advice because they help me see things from a different perspective. After talking to them, I usually feel much more relaxed and clear-headed.

Sugerencia: この回答は質問への内容が不明確で、「Man Forest」「Men's Site」など意味が伝わらない表現があります。また、「celebrating news」「it's most focus」「my year is getting growing」は文法的に不自然です。友達と話す具体的な話題を2つ程度選び、現在の話題と理由を明確に述べてください。例えば、最近のニュース、勉強、将来の計画などを、自然な語句と具体例で説明しましょう。

Ejemplo: We usually talk about current events, study, and our future plans. Recently, we’ve been discussing university applications and the latest news on social media. We also share funny videos when we want to relax.

Sugerencia: 少人数を好むという意見と、信頼できる友達なら何でも話せるという理由は適切です。ただし、一文が非常に長く、最後が「and they also」で途切れています。「one individual or only two or three friends」は「one close friend or a small group of two or three people」とすると自然です。また、「long far distance friend」は「a friend who lives far away」に直し、理由を2文程度で完結させてください。

Ejemplo: I prefer talking to one close friend or a small group of two or three people. I feel more comfortable with trusted friends because I can speak openly about my feelings. In a large group, I sometimes find it difficult to express myself.

Sugerencia: どちらの方法でも内容が重要だという意見はありますが、回答全体の意味が不明瞭です。「It doesn't matter about the format」は「The format doesn’t really matter to me」とし、「what you are sharing while you are trending」など意味の伝わりにくい部分は具体化しましょう。対面とSNSの両方について、どのような場合に便利かを比較し、具体例を1つ加えると説得力が増します。

Ejemplo: The format doesn’t really matter to me; it depends on the situation. I prefer face-to-face conversations for serious topics because they feel more personal. However, I use social media when I just want to share a quick update or make plans.

Sugerencia: 旅行中の具体的な経験と、友達の意見を尊重すべきだという考えは良い点です。しかし、「immutual」は不適切で、おそらく「unusual」または「unhelpful」を意図していると考えられます。「I don't shouldn't be that strict」は「I shouldn’t be too strict」としましょう。また、「友達だから家族ではない」という部分は不自然で誤解を招くため、対立を解決する方法を明確に述べてください。

Ejemplo: Yes, I sometimes argue with my friends, although it doesn’t happen very often. For example, I once argued with a friend during a trip because we disagreed about our plans. However, we talked about it calmly and agreed to respect each other’s opinions.

× Yeah, I really love chatting with friends sometimes when I cannot find a way out I always like to listen to their advice because it can learn another perspective to understand what I'm thinking and it really helps a lot.

✓ Yeah, I really love chatting with friends. Sometimes, when I cannot find a way out, I like to listen to their advice because it helps me understand what I am thinking from another perspective, and it really helps a lot.

The original is a run-on sentence with several clauses joined without appropriate punctuation or structure. Also, it can learn is incorrect because it does not clearly express who learns. Use it helps me understand or it helps me gain another perspective.

× What I would say on the Man Forest may be the celebrating news and the trends, but currently it's most focus on the Men's Site and Study.

✓ What I would say about the main focus may be the latest news and trends, but currently it mostly focuses on men's life and studies.

Use about, not on, when introducing the subject being discussed. The phrase mostly focuses on requires the preposition on after focuses.

× What I would say on the Man Forest may be the celebrating news and the trends, but currently it's most focus on the Men's Site and Study.

✓ What I would say about the main focus may be the latest news and trends, but currently it mostly focuses on men's life and studies.

The subject it requires a present-tense verb with the third-person singular ending: focuses. Most focus is not grammatically correct in this sentence.

× What I would say on the Man Forest may be the celebrating news and the trends, but currently it's most focus on the Men's Site and Study.

✓ What I would say about the main focus may be the latest news and trends, but currently it mostly focuses on men's life and studies.

Mostly is an adverb and correctly modifies the verb focuses. Most cannot be used in this position to mean mainly.

× It's really interesting that after my year is getting growing and overthinking is getting deep.

✓ It is really interesting that, as I get older, my interest is growing and my overthinking is becoming more intense.

The original clause after my year is getting growing is not grammatically structured. Use a clear time expression such as as I get older, followed by complete clauses with appropriate verbs.

× I prefer to chat with one individual or only two or three friends together and it must be the trustworthy friend but not the long far distance friend.

✓ I prefer to chat with one individual or only two or three friends together, and they must be trustworthy friends, not long-distance friends.

Use the plural form friends because the sentence refers to one individual or two or three people. The article the is also unnecessary before the general adjective trustworthy. Use a before a singular countable noun, as in a trustworthy friend.

× I prefer to chat with one individual or only two or three friends together and it must be the trustworthy friend but not the long far distance friend.

✓ I prefer to chat with one individual or only two or three friends together, and they must be trustworthy friends, not long-distance friends.

Long-distance is a compound adjective and should appear directly before the noun: long-distance friends. The original sequence long far distance friend is not a natural adjective order.

× I prefer to chat with one individual or only two or three friends together and it must be the trustworthy friend but not the long far distance friend because only with all of those trusted friends I can speak out anything that I want to say and they also

✓ I prefer to chat with one individual or only two or three friends together. They must be trustworthy friends, not long-distance friends, because only with those trusted friends can I say anything I want to say. They also understand me well.

The original contains several independent ideas joined together, and the sentence ends without a complete clause after they also. Divide the ideas into complete sentences. After only with those trusted friends, use inversion: can I say.

× It really doesn't matter about the format. It all matters about the content, what you are sharing while you are trending.

✓ The format does not really matter. What matters is the content of what you are sharing, not how you are communicating.

Matter does not normally take about in this structure. Say the format does not matter or what matters is the content. The second sentence is also more naturally structured with content of what you are sharing.

× If someone just face to face, but they are still trying something waste of their time for that moment pleasure is not the case.

✓ If someone is communicating face-to-face but is still doing something that wastes their time for temporary pleasure, that is not acceptable.

The if-clause is missing a main verb after someone. Use is communicating to form a complete clause. The expression something waste of their time also needs a relative clause: something that wastes their time.

× If someone just face to face, but they are still trying something waste of their time for that moment pleasure is not the case.

✓ If someone is communicating face-to-face but is still doing something that wastes their time for temporary pleasure, that is not acceptable.

The original has an incomplete if-clause and unclear clause boundaries. A complete conditional sentence needs an if-clause and a clear main clause. The corrected sentence provides both parts.

× So I don't shouldn't be that strict.

✓ So I shouldn't be that strict.

Do not use do not and should not together before the same verb. Shouldn't already expresses the negative modal meaning, so say I shouldn't be.