Part 1
Examiner
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
Candidate
Actually, I never owned the bike. Umm, reason being I was very afraid of riding bicycles 'cause I would see kids falling and hurting themselves.
Examiner
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
Candidate
Yes, they are actually. We have a province, uh Eastern Province, which uses more bikes compared to vehicles. It's actually viewed as an easy way of transport and very cheap source of transport.
Did you have a bike when you were a child?
Score: 76.0Suggestion: Be more concise, avoid fillers (e.g., “umm”) and slightly expand with a clear topic sentence + one specific supporting detail using a linking word. Also correct minor phrasing: say “a bike” instead of “the bike,” and use “because” rather than informal contractions. Aim for 2–3 sentences, natural vocabulary, and coherent flow.
Example: No, I didn’t have a bike as a child. I was afraid of riding because I often saw other children fall and get hurt, so my parents didn’t buy one for me.
Do you think bikes are popular in your country?
Score: 82.0Suggestion: Avoid hesitations like “uh” and repetition of “actually.” Start with a clear topic sentence, then use a linking word to add a specific detail or example (e.g., mention reasons or a comparison). Use natural phrases such as “a cheap form of transport” and limit to 2–3 sentences for clarity.
Example: Yes, bikes are quite popular in my country. For example, in the Eastern Province many people prefer bicycles because they are an inexpensive and convenient form of transport for short distances.
× Actually, I never owned the bike.
✓ Actually, I never owned a bike.
The issue is not verb+ing but article use (general reference). Replace 'the bike' with 'a bike' to refer to owning any bicycle in childhood. Use indefinite article for non-specific singular nouns.
× Umm, reason being I was very afraid of riding bicycles 'cause I would see kids falling and hurting themselves.
✓ Umm, the reason was that I was very afraid of riding bicycles because I would see kids falling and hurting themselves.
The original uses an informal fragment 'reason being' and a colloquial contraction ''cause'. Make it a full clause: 'the reason was that' introduces the explanation. 'Because' is more appropriate in formal speech; keep 'would' to indicate habitual past observation.
× Yes, they are actually.
✓ Yes, they are.
No grammar error severe, but 'actually' is unnecessary. Removing it produces a clearer, more natural short answer. This addresses redundancy rather than strict grammatical error.
× We have a province, uh Eastern Province, which uses more bikes compared to vehicles.
✓ In the Eastern Province, people use bikes more than vehicles.
Original phrasing 'which uses more bikes compared to vehicles' is awkward and misuses 'compared to'. Use subject 'people' and the comparative structure 'more than' for clarity. Also move the location to the front for natural word order.
× It's actually viewed as an easy way of transport and very cheap source of transport.
✓ It is viewed as an easy and cheap means of transport.
Combine adjectives before a noun: 'easy and cheap means of transport' is more natural. 'Way of transport' and 'source of transport' are redundant; 'means of transport' is the correct collocation. Also avoid repeating 'transport'.